[Home | Mail Archive | Join the mail archive | Photo Gallery ]

Mazda Rotary Pickup Forum
you are logged in as
profile | register | faq | search (active threads) | memberlist
Sponsored by:
Index > Engine/Drivetrain > Thread: Vacuum Advance question.
Thread: Vacuum Advance question.
EricRyan


Revvin Up
Posts: 61
posted July 09, 2010 03:42 PM

Vacuum Advance question.

Hey guys, I've been having vacuum advance plugged ever since I got the truck and I would like to get it going to make the first few gears a little easier to get through. I've got an RB IM and Dellorto carb, so there are only 4 vacuum nipples to "T" off of, I'm also hesitant to drill & tap the carb so I would prefer any other option first.

Brake booster and oil filler neck seem to use manifold vacuum so that wouldn't be an option. But what about the 2 nipples for OMP, which are still in use? I know I need venturi vacuum for this to work properly, so would making 2 separate "T" fittings off of each OMP vacuum lines work? Would there be any negative side effects?

Thanks in advance.

       
View IP (Administrators only)
Klaus42


Rotorhead
Posts: 1877
posted July 10, 2010 07:59 PM

I wouldn't do anything that could possibly compromise or interfere with metering oil delivery, and I think I'd want to try to get the 'right' person on the phone/email at Racing Beat regarding their recommendations for the Dellorto, including running the vacuum advance.

Brad might have some good info. for you as well.

       
View IP (Administrators only)
sparky


Redlining
Posts: 299
posted July 10, 2010 09:19 PM

This is what i did on my series 4 engine with weber carb that also had the vacuum check valves for oil metering injection.
What i did was go with the 2 oil injection points into the rotor housings. Installed an oil metering pump with 2 outlets rather than the 4 that was on the series 4 front cover.
On the lower intake manifold i tapped and brazed some steel tubing into the brake booster tap and connected the vacuum lines the check valves.
Hope this is helpful.
____________
'77 REPU
Stock 6-port
T-2 tranny
Weber IDA 48
Alum Flywheel
3rd gen Torsen in rear end.
DLDFIS ignition

       
View IP (Administrators only)
EricRyan


Revvin Up
Posts: 61
posted July 11, 2010 10:09 PM

My motor is an '83 so I already have only 2 OMP lines. So what you're saying is that I could T off of my existing brake booster line? As long as I use a one-way check valve, would this give the advance the proper vacuum it needs?

       
View IP (Administrators only)
sparky


Redlining
Posts: 299
posted July 12, 2010 07:56 AM

If i rememver right, i don't think you should use vacuum advance with weber and dellorto carbs???

____________
'77 REPU
Stock 6-port
T-2 tranny
Weber IDA 48
Alum Flywheel
3rd gen Torsen in rear end.
DLDFIS ignition

       
View IP (Administrators only)
ericryan


Revvin Up
Posts: 61
posted July 12, 2010 09:33 AM

What's the reasoning behind that though? Is it a problem with fuel delivery?

I think I read somewhere Weber's instructions call for you to remove and cap the advance nipples, but I had no idea about Dellorto. I'm still new to carb's so you'll have to forgive me, but I really am trying to get my head around all of it.

       
View IP (Administrators only)
Klaus42


Rotorhead
Posts: 1877
posted July 12, 2010 09:34 AM

quote:
If i rememver right, i don't think you should use vacuum advance with weber and dellorto carbs???



If it has a vacuum diaphragm, it must have been meant to be used... (Lol!)

Now, where is that special tool that's required to adjust the compression?

       
View IP (Administrators only)
Brad


Rotorhead
Posts: 1672
posted July 12, 2010 01:53 PM

The 2 nipples on the Dellorto for OMP should be used for OMP. They are a ways upstream of the throttle butterflys. To properly do a ported vacuum advance you want the vacuum port to be right above, upstream of the butterflys. Don't premix when you have a perfectly good OMP system in place. Premixing is overrated in street cars and the smell *horrible*.

If you try using the OMP nipples on the carb with T fittings, definately use a check valve so oil won't creep into the vacuum hose for distributor. I wouldn't do this.

Much easier to use Manifold Vacuum for timing. The Weber IDF has a vacuum port for ported vacuum. Find a pic of that for reference if you choose to drill the Dellorto.
____________
-brad-
74 REPU Lawn Green
81 Rx-7 racecar. 12a J-
Bridge

       
View IP (Administrators only)
EricRyan


Revvin Up
Posts: 61
posted July 12, 2010 03:55 PM

quote:
The 2 nipples on the Dellorto for OMP should be used for OMP. They are a ways upstream of the throttle butterflys. To properly do a ported vacuum advance you want the vacuum port to be right above, upstream of the butterflys. Don't premix when you have a perfectly good OMP system in place. Premixing is overrated in street cars and the smell *horrible*.

If you try using the OMP nipples on the carb with T fittings, definately use a check valve so oil won't creep into the vacuum hose for distributor. I wouldn't do this.

Much easier to use Manifold Vacuum for timing. The Weber IDF has a vacuum port for ported vacuum. Find a pic of that for reference if you choose to drill the Dellorto.


Good answer. I spent some time with a long PDF file on venturi vs. ported vs. manifold vacuum and I have a much better understanding of where I need to drill and tap, and why. Was planning on using a one-way check valve if I had done the OMP idea, but if it's not even the right type of vacuum AND could possibly compromise the oiling system, what's the point?

Gonna go outside and take a look at what I'll be tackling tomorrow. Thanks for all the rays of light guys, really appreciate it.

       
View IP (Administrators only)
All times are PST (US)
Post New Topic    Post New Reply
Rate Topic:
Powerd By: BlazeBoard

[Home | Mail Archive | Join the mail archive | Photo Gallery ]
0.028739213943481 seconds processing time